1. The 20th century has been the century of women and their quasi-silent revolution. A bloodless feminism thesis statement revolution that does not fit with the masculine myth of revolutions or with the heroic epic that is presupposed. The incorporation of women into the public sphere and into politics has meant that democracy, finally, lived up to its name and its universalist vocation. However, the political, social and economic exclusion of women and the relations of inequality between the sexes persist in most social scenarios and are the workhorse of feminism as a civic movement, as a political theory and as an intersectional analysis of oppressions.
2. The 21st century should be decisive for the historical advance of feminism thesis statement in its search for an egalitarian society. The magnitude of the enemies to face does not seem insignificant in these times of ascent of a misogynist extreme right that aspires to the global hegemony. Such an emergency is a reactive consequence of the impacts of neoliberalism that has generated a precarization of life that affects social majorities in practically all countries of the planet. In Europe, North America and other favored parts of the world in recent decades have meant the collapse of the middle classes once organized capitalism, which included welfare policies, is being dismantled. Since the so-called crisis of 2008, this process of erosion of the public has accelerated, expanding the poverty and social exclusion of large sectors in which women and children are overrepresented.
3. Given the political crisis of social democracy, linked to its cooptation by neoliberalism and the renunciation of its own egalitarian traditions, and of the so-called alternative lefts, but, for the moment, incapable of generating a coherent political agenda – the thesis statement for women’s equality is a transnationalized movement with a clear agenda. Indeed, there are zones of dissent, but there are also solid consensus that has demanded the human rights of women, social justice and the radicalization of democracy in an egalitarian sense.
4. Today, thesis statement for women’s equality is the guardian of human rights in a context of denunciation of femicide and gender violence, while reactivating its anti-war vein in the face of the current processes of militarization and paramilitarization in force in large areas of the planet. It is therefore necessary to rehabilitate the link between feminism and pacifism, a relationship that illuminates a genealogy that enables women as “peacebuilders” in numerous conflicts over the centuries.
Feminism is today, in short, the guardian and the guardian of human rights in a context of denunciation of femicide and gender violence
5. As these last month’s demonstrate, thesis statement on feminism is a movement capable of mobilizing before the extreme right. Some outstanding examples are those of the US, Argentina, Poland … The mobilization in Spain in 2014 – the so-called Tren de la Libertad – against the restriction to abortion, ended with a victory and belongs to this type of defensive mobilizations.
6. In the face of neoliberal hegemony, thesis statement on feminism must react and denounce the drift of the bodies of girls and women. It is not possible to continue closing the eyes to the trafficking of women for their labor, sexual and reproductive exploitation. You cannot agree with a progressive neoliberalism, a sexual neoliberalism, and lover of differences that masks the exploitation of social majorities. Feminism must analyze and propose political alternatives in local, national and global terms to give an option to the structural injustices of which extreme migrations for survival and the exodus of refugees are refugees.
Faced with neoliberal hegemony, feminism must react and denounce the drift of the bodies of girls and women.
7. The feminist thesis statement agenda is configured, in short, at different scales: local, national, transnational and global. We must highlight the areas of consensus within the movement that should not be obscured by disagreements on various issues. The four fundamental consensuses are:
The utopia of a life free of violence
The denunciation of feminism thesis and gender violence is the most urgent claim. The affirmation that if violence against women does not stop peace is impossible is one of her last formulations. This reconnection of feminism and pacifism reveals its long reach and requires an investment of political resources. It demands the visibility of a feminist genealogy of organizations – like WILPF – that support the protagonism of women in conflicts and post-conflicts, but also the opposition to the “culture of rape” and a patriarchy that today is combined with a capitalism wild that exploits and normalizes structural and symbolic violence.
Sexual and reproductive freedom
The struggle for sexual and reproductive rights is and will be one of the great concerns of feminism thesis of this century. Formulated from the origins of suffragists, socialists and anarchists is key today when the right to abortion recedes in various parts of the world and in some of them has never been consolidated. Feminism also opened the door to the demand for sexual freedom and gave legitimacy to the sexual-affective diversity that is repressed by the neo-fascist emergency.
The design of an egalitarian society
Equality of rights is the foundational requirement of enlightened feminism and suffragist, but the demand for social justice makes socialist and anarchist feminism have endowed it with greater scope. Feminism is allergic to inequalities. It is not possible, then, a global right and / or financial feminism, above radical egalitarianism. Feminism thesis statements does not admit exploitation or old or new slavery. It is, from its origins, a movement of liberation and emancipation incompatible with the visions of the right, be it neoliberal or neo-fascist.
The universalization of care as co-responsibility
A program to be discussed is to denaturalize, de-privatize and de-commodify care. This last point involves subverting the entire economy to put it at the service of life and not of markets. It gives rise to the alternatives of the Feminist Economy in the direction of a Solidarity Economy.
8. It is imperative to clarify the territory of the thesis on feminism disagreements that invite sororicidal and promote sorority because being a woman today is still the reason why we are murdered and raped even though some have their social, geopolitical and ethno position.
We have never been content with just interpreting the world; feminists have always wanted to transform it.
9. Ecofeminism, a rich vein of theoretical analysis and activism often connected with the pacifist current, cannot be disregarded today given that its approaches are more necessary than ever in the context of a global ecological crisis and a breakthrough of the destruction of the planet. Their contributions reinforce the lines of the consensus thesis about feminism agenda focused on non-violence, sexual and reproductive freedom, egalitarianism and the need for an ethic and a policy of planetary care that includes non-human animals and ecosystems.
10. The incorporation of political feminist thesis in the hard core of the left is inexcusable. This process of putting political, social and economic equality at the center must be parallel to the critique of the sexist and heterosexist bias of institutions. The deconstruction of hegemonic masculinity is a task in which progressive men need to engage and, to do so, they must object to their modes of sociability and subjectivities.
11. We have never been satisfied with just interpreting the world; feminists have always wanted to transform it. We now live a dangerous moment, if the advance of the extreme right is consolidated, the backsliding of human rights will be inevitable. It is time to call for a generalized mobilization and to pursue the alliance with all the social movements that strive to achieve a scenario of non-violence and the disappearance of inequalities.