Romeo and Juliet thesis: Brief summary of the work
“Romeo and Juliet” is a work written around 1597 by the English writer and playwright William Shakespeare. Based on an Italian legend, it tells the story of two families from Verona confronted by old hatreds, the Montagues and the Capulets. In line with thesis statement for Romeo and Juliet, Romeo Montague falls in love with Juliet, the daughter of the Capulets. Knowing that their love is not going to be allowed by their families, they decide to plot a plan to get married in secret and escape together. But in a dispute, Romeo ends up killing Theobald, cousin of Juliet and is banished for it. Julieta then draws up a plan so that her entire family will believe her dead and thus be able to flee with her love. She drinks a potion that will let her sleep and is buried with the intention of being released later from her coffin and be free. But Romeo is not informed in time and believing really dead Juliet takes his life before his coffin. She, upon awakening from her dream and seeing that Romeo has committed suicide, chooses to do the same thing broken by the pain. After the death of the two young people, the families, impressed by what happened, decide to sign peace between them.
Personal essay on the novel and its main theme: thesis statements for Romeo and Juliet
“Romeo and Juliet” is one of the most popular works of its author; one of the most represented and most often has been versioned in theaters. It has become a symbol of passionate love and romanticism. According to the Romeo and Juliet thesis statement, there are many who say that the work is about the love that can do everything; others claim that it is a story about hatred and its destructive power; I believe that in a certain way, it could be said that it is a novel about the lack of communication and its fatal consequences.
Why do I defend that this novel should not be a symbol of romantic love? For start, Romeo falls in love with Juliet just seeing her. This, a constant in many novels, could not be considered love but only attraction since a real and deep love is based on the mutual knowledge and not on a physical attraction or on words in a dance. Throughout the work, there is very little time that both lovers have to meet and talk. His love is therefore a strong desire among adolescents strengthened only by the prohibition of being together. We all know that the forbidden is much more attractive to young people and can make them much more stubborn. Did Romeo and Juliet open up in love if they had carte blanche to express their feelings? It could be, but the opposite could also happen. We will never know. But what we do know is that they did not have enough time to discover it, much less to develop a feeling so strong that it pushes them to suicide. It would be, then, from my point of view, of youthful romantic rebellion and not of true love.
Is hatred then the real engine of history? This is what many defend, that “Romeo and Juliet” is a story about hate and its terrible consequences. It is hatred that makes the Montagues and the Capulets not understand each other. It is also the old grudges that lead Theobald, Juliet’s cousin, to kill Mercutio and Romeo to kill Theobald in revenge. But Romeo and Juliet do not die as a direct consequence of these hatreds that seem to invade all the characters in the story, but because of the misunderstandings that complicate their plan to be together. Although this evil feeling is present throughout the novel, it is not from my point of view the essence of it.
Why do I think then that it is the lack of communication that really triggers the whole story and its true soul? Let’s analyze thesis statement Romeo and Juliet:
The lack of communication is what makes Capulets and Montagues hate each other. We do not know the origin of their resentment, but we know that after the death of the two lovers the families talk and reconcile, realizing the absurdity of continuing to face each other. Hate is therefore a consequence of lack of communication and in the same way that there was an approach to the end of the story, it could have been much earlier if they had sat down to talk.
It is also the lack of communication that leads the two young people to love each other in secret. It is true that it is probable that they were not allowed to be together, at least not in principle, but it is also true that they did not try to explain their feelings to their families at any time, opting from the beginning for the secrets and lies that they ended up costing them their lives.
Finally, Juliet’s plan to run away with Romeo is truncated because Romeo does not receive the letter explaining that Julieta was not really dead. Again the lack of communication makes its appearance in history and it happens again because Romeo, thinking that his beloved has died, acts impulsively, without talking to anyone and therefore without possibilities for him to know the truth. He dies without reason, for ignoring the truth and not because his love was forbidden.
If the Montagues and the Capulets had sat down to talk and resolve their differences, there would not have been such a prolonged confrontation. It is evident from thesis for Romeo and Juliet that they were not irresolvable problems since finally, although too late for the lovers of Verona, if they could become friends again. If Julieta and Romeo had the courage to talk to each other, plot their plans together and not act each one on their own, neither would their story have had such a tragic end. That is why I defend that the true heart of history is the lack of communication and its dramatic consequences for men.
Argumentative Romeo and Juliet essay thesis
In the story of the play “Romeo and Juliet”, it is said that the families Montague (family of Romeo) and Capulet (family of Juliet) were enemy families for many generations. For this reason the two families did not agree with the relationship of Romeo and Juliet. In this thesis statement of Romeo and Juliet I am going to argue about why I am against the decision of both families to forbid the relationship of Romeo and Juliet.
I believe that they should not intervene in the relationship because Romeo and Juliet are free to decide what they want to do for their life. Families may be enemies, but that is no excuse to avoid a courtship. The fact that they are together does not mean that families have to be obligatorily friends, although it would be best for Romeo and Juliet.
Nor should they avoid this relationship because the relationship helps each one to raise their self-esteem. It helped a lot to Romeo to meet Juliet and to know that she loves him as much as he loves her, since in the story it turns out that Romeo was depressed because he could not stop thinking about Rosalinda. Speaking about thesis of Romeo and Juliet, one of the advantages of being in a relationship is that it makes you want more each day for who you are, since you know that there is a person who loves everything about you, from how you are with others to your own personality. It makes you feel appreciated, loved and at the same time flattered, which helps you feel better.
The last reason why I think that the Montague and Capulet families should not intervene or prohibit Romeo and Juliet to continue together or that they continue to see each other is because a relationship helps to learn to mature in different aspects faster. In this sense, their relationship helps Romeo gradually overcome Rosalinda and lets her know that she should only think about the present and the future she wants with the girl of her life, which is Julieta Capulets.
For this and other reasons is that I do not agree with the decision that the two families made regarding the relationship of Romeo and Juliet.